A bizarre case of reverse snobbery

Jul 11th 2009
View Comments
respond
trackback


 

blacksheep

I have asked myself for a few days whether I have reason to feel discriminated or whether there is something that I have not yet fully understood which prevents me from seeing the bigger picture. I have concluded that I do have good reason: in this country we must be suffering from a strange case of reverse snobbery.

I generally take blows on the chin. I dust myself off and carry on. On two occasions this year, however, I have felt that my working in a private school has unfairly counted against me in terms of professional development.

Earlier this year, there was a call for applicants to fill the role of Regional Subject Adviser at the Association of Language Learning (ALL), a body of which I am a member and for which I write occasionally on the use of ICT in Education.

This particular association is very strong in other parts of the country (with an excellent network in the London area) but not so where I live and work: the East Midlands. A number of people suggested I should apply for this role and I agreed: I thought that this would be an excellent opportunity to get stuck in and establish a strong network of modern languages teachers around Nottingham.

Unfortunately, it was not to be. After a short email exchange with ALL, it was pointed out to me that only teachers in the maintained state sector need apply. Had I been allowed to apply and subsequently fail, it wouldn’t have been so bad. Dust myself off and the rest… But this time it was harder to stomach, this particular avenue had been closed to me solely on the grounds of who my employer was, not on my ability (or lack of) to do the job.

More recently, Teachers.tv, who also manage the eponymous website, sent out a call for volunteers for a series of case studies on the effective use of ICT in education to be filmed and broadcast later on this year. Again, it was suggested to me that the work I had been doing using social networks and micro-blogging with my secondary students would be of interest to them and that I should get in touch.

Buoyed by such comments, I put myself forward and, to my surprise, the production company in charge of filming the programmes phoned me back. They were very enthusiastic and it was decided that they would come for a preliminary filming visit in the second half of June. How exciting! I was going to be on the tv!

Then I got the phone call. Unfortunately, when the production company passed on my details to Teachers.tv, they decided not to film me after all, because… you’ve guessed it: I work in a private school.

ALL were very happy to accept me and my school as members, so long as we sent along our cheques. Teachers.tv benefited in other ways: it was happy to have me as an associate who was willing to distribute and promote their advertisement-laden magazines and website among my colleagues.

We all know that sharing practice across the sectors is a good idea, we do it already at conferences and unconferences around the country. And I know that these bodies may be under pressure to represent the public sector because of government funding or other such factors, but I too am a tax payer and so are my students’ parents.

The irony of all this, of course, is that the government recognises the strengths and innovation which often go on in the independent sector. That’s why it has set up the much trumpeted academies all over the country, which are, in effect, a strange mixture of independent and state education.

However, when it comes to overtly sharing resources across the sectors this very strange reverse snobbery becomes apparent: organisations that may depend on public funding must demonstrate their allegiance by ostensibly rejecting the independent sector.

It doesn’t stop there, sometimes some (I emphasise some) teachers in the state sector view themselves as real teachers who have somehow earned the stripes and are superior to us in the independent sector, who, apparently, have an easy life. As if teaching challenging kid with behaviour problems is the only teaching there is.

This means, therefore, that we could not possibly have anything to offer the state sector, as we don’t understand its specific needs… (I hope this sounds as ludicrous to you as it does to me).

So, there you have it: a very bizarre case of reverse snobbery.

Photo from Flickr – foxypar4
Related Posts with Thumbnails

This post is tagged , ,

  • http://www.clickbiology.com/ Allison Gardner

    I agree. I have had the same problem.
    I was a good and committed state school teacher, at a very good state school. However a vast proportion of my time was behaviour management, having to factor in time during lessons for counting out and counting back in scalpels for example.

    On moving to the independent sector I no longer had behaviour issues. Now I really had to TEACH, no excuses and no lost minutes in lessons. Plus parent are very interested in their children’s education (often incorrectly assuming paying for education effectively means buying A grades, not so), so we have a different sort of demanding parent.

    Finally, if we are not up to scratch we can get the sack. There are no Peter Principal promotions (promoting weak class teachers out of the classroom) and a lot of accountability. Hence now I really view myself as a Teacher or Educator (as our American cousins would say). By the way, my school is non-selective and we do have a range of abilities. Plus we are encouraged to hone our subject knowledge and several colleagues, myself included, are encouraged to work towards doctorates or Masters degrees in their SUBJECT area. Hence we are treated with a lot of respect by the students, parents and management.

    If these organisations are cutting us out then more fool them, they are missing out on a well of expertise. Reverse snobbery strikes again.

  • http://www.clickbiology.com Allison Gardner

    I agree. I have had the same problem.
    I was a good and committed state school teacher, at a very good state school. However a vast proportion of my time was behaviour management, having to factor in time during lessons for counting out and counting back in scalpels for example.

    On moving to the independent sector I no longer had behaviour issues. Now I really had to TEACH, no excuses and no lost minutes in lessons. Plus parent are very interested in their children’s education (often incorrectly assuming paying for education effectively means buying A grades, not so), so we have a different sort of demanding parent.

    Finally, if we are not up to scratch we can get the sack. There are no Peter Principal promotions (promoting weak class teachers out of the classroom) and a lot of accountability. Hence now I really view myself as a Teacher or Educator (as our American cousins would say). By the way, my school is non-selective and we do have a range of abilities. Plus we are encouraged to hone our subject knowledge and several colleagues, myself included, are encouraged to work towards doctorates or Masters degrees in their SUBJECT area. Hence we are treated with a lot of respect by the students, parents and management.

    If these organisations are cutting us out then more fool them, they are missing out on a well of expertise. Reverse snobbery strikes again.

  • Graham Davies

    This is a sad state of affairs, José. The independent sector, along with a few selective grammar schools and language colleges, is providing this country with its best linguists – as it has done for many years.

    In my experience as a partner in a business that sells language teaching and learning materials to schools, I can honestly say that since languages were made optional beyond KS3 the independent sector has provided us with 90% of our trade. The feedback that I get from independent schools is that they are making good use of the materials and in addition they are doing a lot more in the use of ICT in language teaching and learning.

    I often give presentations to teachers at conferences and workshops on using ICT in language learning and teaching. When I look at the lists of participants half or more come from the independent sector.

    This probably explains the policy of ALL and Teachers TV. It’s a political issue. Languages in the state sector are in such a parlous state that feel obliged to give state schools a boost by showing examples of good practice in state schools – and it’s clear that they HAVE found some good examples, but there are many more in the independent sector that have been overlooked.

    Graham

  • Graham Davies

    This is a sad state of affairs, José. The independent sector, along with a few selective grammar schools and language colleges, is providing this country with its best linguists – as it has done for many years.

    In my experience as a partner in a business that sells language teaching and learning materials to schools, I can honestly say that since languages were made optional beyond KS3 the independent sector has provided us with 90% of our trade. The feedback that I get from independent schools is that they are making good use of the materials and in addition they are doing a lot more in the use of ICT in language teaching and learning.

    I often give presentations to teachers at conferences and workshops on using ICT in language learning and teaching. When I look at the lists of participants half or more come from the independent sector.

    This probably explains the policy of ALL and Teachers TV. It’s a political issue. Languages in the state sector are in such a parlous state that feel obliged to give state schools a boost by showing examples of good practice in state schools – and it’s clear that they HAVE found some good examples, but there are many more in the independent sector that have been overlooked.

    Graham

  • Guest

    Thanks Allison for your comment. I am perplexed by what is almost certainly perceived as positive discrimination in favour of state schools, which, in a way, I can understand.

    However, I think we are all in the same business and striving for the same goals, therefore having a them and us attitude, never mind how well-intentioned, is deeply counter-productive.

  • http://www.boxoftricks.net José Picardo

    Thanks Allison for your comment. I am perplexed by what is almost certainly perceived as positive discrimination in favour of state schools, which, in a way, I can understand.

    However, I think we are all in the same business and striving for the same goals, therefore having a them and us attitude, never mind how well-intentioned, is deeply counter-productive.

  • Guest

    Thanks for your comment, Graham, I fully appreciate your points, which did not escape my consideration. I do indeed understand why ALL and Teachers.tv act they way they do, I just don’t think it’s right.

    I think it is hypocritical to, on the one hand, expect contributions, financial or otherwise, from all sectors while, on the other, discriminate between state and independent sectors when it comes to showcasing good practice, which remains good regardless of where it takes place.

    I know personally many of the state sector teachers who have been selected for the Teachers.tv series on ICT, that’s why I know the programmes are going to be fantastic. There is no denying that.

    Yes, as you can probably tell, I am just sorry that my work was deemed to be good enough to showcase (not by me, I hasten to add!) but in the end it wasn’t because I don’t teach in the state sector. I almost wish they’d told me what I was doing was rubbish and that is why it didn’t feature!

    Anyway, I don’t want to come across as bitter about it in a feeling-sorry-for-myself sort of way. I just wished to highlight the reasons why, on these two occasions, my work was not considered because of its own merits or value, but rather because I am not a state sector teacher.

    And I don’t think that’s right.

  • http://www.boxoftricks.net José Picardo

    Thanks for your comment, Graham, I fully appreciate your points, which did not escape my consideration. I do indeed understand why ALL and Teachers.tv act they way they do, I just don’t think it’s right.

    I think it is hypocritical to, on the one hand, expect contributions, financial or otherwise, from all sectors while, on the other, discriminate between state and independent sectors when it comes to showcasing good practice, which remains good regardless of where it takes place.

    I know personally many of the state sector teachers who have been selected for the Teachers.tv series on ICT, that’s why I know the programmes are going to be fantastic. There is no denying that.

    Yes, as you can probably tell, I am just sorry that my work was deemed to be good enough to showcase (not by me, I hasten to add!) but in the end it wasn’t because I don’t teach in the state sector. I almost wish they’d told me what I was doing was rubbish and that is why it didn’t feature!

    Anyway, I don’t want to come across as bitter about it in a feeling-sorry-for-myself sort of way. I just wished to highlight the reasons why, on these two occasions, my work was not considered because of its own merits or value, but rather because I am not a state sector teacher.

    And I don’t think that’s right.

  • http://aliceayel.posterous.com/ Alice

    This is very interesting Jose. I worked in a state school for 5 years where the behaviour was not as bad as in other schools. But still as Allison stated, I didn’t feel I could teach “properly” in every lessons. Top sets were good but bottom sets were a struggle. Also languages were not regarded as important. This is why I was looking for another job in the independent sector where I could actually teach my subject. When I talked to my colleagues, most of them said they could not teach in a private school because the children were posh! Why? because parents in private schools are actually concerned about their children and are ready to pay, they are bad? As you say reverse snobbery is striking!

  • http://aliceayel.posterous.com/ Alice

    This is very interesting Jose. I worked in a state school for 5 years where the behaviour was not as bad as in other schools. But still as Allison stated, I didn’t feel I could teach “properly” in every lessons. Top sets were good but bottom sets were a struggle. Also languages were not regarded as important. This is why I was looking for another job in the independent sector where I could actually teach my subject. When I talked to my colleagues, most of them said they could not teach in a private school because the children were posh! Why? because parents in private schools are actually concerned about their children and are ready to pay, they are bad? As you say reverse snobbery is striking!

blog comments powered by Disqus




Featured Posts



Popular Posts



Interactive Whiteboard Tutorials




Monthly Archives


Categories

Flickr

gala gala-differences concha concha-differences florist florist-differences chinon chinon-differences cadaques cadaques-differences beach beach-differences

Twitter

Recent Visitors